<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sound Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justajunkie.com/2009/03/04/sound-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justajunkie.com/2009/03/04/sound-design/</link>
	<description>Looking for My Next Fix</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 05:11:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virginia</title>
		<link>http://justajunkie.com/2009/03/04/sound-design/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Virginia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 01:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justajunkie.com/?p=92#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Great clips!  Thank you for sharing them!
There was actually a study done on the effects of audio quality on audiences.  First, they had an audience watch a movie.  Then, they had the audience watch the same movie, with better sound.  When they asked the audience members what, if anything, had changed, everyone said the picture was better the second viewing.  People knew the movie was better, but they perceived it as a visual improvement, which is interesting)
(sorry, I don&#039;t remember who did the study.  It&#039;s on the tip of my brain...I remember it was a college professor who told us about it, and it was an organization he really respected.  It had an acroynm name and they hold yearly conferences)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great clips!  Thank you for sharing them!<br />
There was actually a study done on the effects of audio quality on audiences.  First, they had an audience watch a movie.  Then, they had the audience watch the same movie, with better sound.  When they asked the audience members what, if anything, had changed, everyone said the picture was better the second viewing.  People knew the movie was better, but they perceived it as a visual improvement, which is interesting)<br />
(sorry, I don&#8217;t remember who did the study.  It&#8217;s on the tip of my brain&#8230;I remember it was a college professor who told us about it, and it was an organization he really respected.  It had an acroynm name and they hold yearly conferences)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

